getpdf NLM PubMed Logo https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.64.01.26.9445                 

Sourcing Vanillin via Fermentative Biotechnology

Stefanie Schmidorcid tiny, Beate Berchtoldorcid tiny and Harald Pichler1,2,3,4*orcid tiny

1Institute of Molecular Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Petersgasse 14, 8010 Graz, Austria

2Austrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology (acib GmbH), Krenngasse 37, 8010 Graz, Austria

3NAWI Graz, Mozartgasse 12/2, 8010 Graz, Austria

4BioTechMed Graz, Mozartgasse 12/2, 8010 Graz, Austria

cc by Copyright © 2024 This is a Diamond Open Access article published under CC-BY licence. Copyright remains with the authors, who grant third parties the unrestricted right to use, copy, distribute and reproduce the article as long as the original author(s) and source are acknowledged.

Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2026; 64(1): pp. 126-136.

Article history:

Received: 26 October 2025

Accepted: 16 March 2026

Keywords:

vanillin; biotechnology; recombinant hosts; biotransformation; vanillin toxicity; in situ product removal

E WEB Goal 03E WEB Goal 09E WEB Goal 12The content of this publication has not been approved by the United Nations and does not reflect the views of the United Nations or its officials or Member States.

Summary:

Less than 1 % of the annual worldwide consumption of vanillin can be met by extracting the aromatic compound from vanilla (Vanilla planifolia) pods. For 150 years, vanillin has also been derived through chemical synthesis, which remains the main source (>80 %) of vanillin today, despite growing environmental concerns due to considerable chemical waste disposal issues. ‘Natural’ vanillin is in high demand for flavour and fragrance applications. Thus, biotechnological routes using an array of recombinant hosts have been devised to obtain vanillin through fermentation of natural precursors, e.g. ferulic acid, (iso)eugenol and glucose. These processes, often classical biotransformations, result in ‘natural’ vanillin according to European and US legislation. A significant technical hurdle in fully fermentative routes is vanillin toxicity, which impairs cellular proliferation at relatively low, i.e. commercially uninteresting, vanillin concentrations. In addition to adopting the plant-derived solution, i.e. product glycosylation, to sequester and store vanillin glycosides, sophisticated in situ product removal strategies have been used to obtain industrially relevant amounts of ‘natural’ vanillin.

 

*Corresponding author: +433168734089
  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

INTRODUCTION - VANILLIN

Vanillin, an aromatic aldehyde (4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde, C8H8O3), is the primary aroma compound of the vanilla orchid (Vanilla planifolia), making up mass fraction of 1–2 % in vanilla pods (1). Commercial vanillin is a crystalline white to slightly yellow powder with a sweet vanilla smell. It has a wide variety of industrial applications, spanning from perfumes (as a fragrance) and food (as a flavour component) to pharmaceuticals (as an intermediate compound or odour-masking agent). Global vanillin production reached approx. 60 000 tonnes in 2024 (2, 3).

Classification of vanillin according to origin

Natural vanillin

In 1858, vanillin was first isolated from vanilla pod extracts by Theodore Nicolas Gobley, who then identified its chemical structure (4). Vanilla beans originated in Mexico; however, according to the Food and Agriculture Organisation's global statistical database (5), they are now most commonly produced in Madagascar, Indonesia, Mexico and China. The vanilla orchid is cultivated in moist, warm, tropical climates. Fresh vanilla beans have a rather unpleasant scent and develop the typical sweet smell only upon curing. The beans contain around 20 g of vanillin per kg dry mass, stored as vanillin glycosides. The characteristic, rich ʹvanillaʹ smell is composed of more than 200 molecules; however, vanillin contributes mainly to the characteristic scent (2, 6, 7). Currently, less than 1 % of the globally produced vanillin is harvested from the vanilla plant itself, as the process is costly and dependent on the plant's natural development cycle (3). To produce 1 kg of purified vanillin, roughly 500 kg of vanilla pods are required, necessitating the pollination of around 40 000 vanilla orchid flowers (5). Moreover, vanillin is prone to oxidation and degradation due to reactions with other compounds, which lower the overall quality and purity by forming unwanted side products. This necessitates effective purification steps to obtain pure natural vanillin (8). Therefore, vanilla beans are a low-yield source of vanillin, and it is impossible to meet the market demand in this way. Around 80 % of global vanillin is produced via chemical synthesis, and the rest via biosynthetic pathways. The price of chemically synthesised vanillin is only 1 % that of natural vanillin (2, 3, 9).

Chemical vanillin

In 1875, less than 20 years after its first isolation from the vanilla bean, synthetic vanillin became commercially available in France and the United States, sold for $176 per kg (10). It was obtained by the isomerisation of eugenol, followed by an oxidation step (11). Nowadays, chemical vanillin is produced from aromatic compounds, such as eugenol, guaiacol (10) and lignin (4). While synthetic vanillin is similar to its natural counterpart, it does vary in flavour and smell. This is due to the absence of interactions with associated compounds found in the vanilla bean, through which the full vanilla flavour profile emerges (12). Additionally, chemical vanillin is restricted in some industrial sectors due to concerns about health risks from racemic mixtures (13). The production of chemical vanillin not only involves hazardous chemicals, but it also generates substantial waste, with lignin-derived processes requiring the safe removal of 160 kg of waste per kg of vanillin. This has resulted in the closure of lignin-derived vanillin production in some regions due to environmental concerns (4, 10).

Bio-vanillin

Microbial-based production methods offer a promising approach to address the increasing demand for sustainable and economically viable vanillin production. Vanillin produced from natural precursors such as lignin, ferulic acid, isoeugenol, eugenol and glucose through microbial fermentation is categorised as ’natural’ by the European and US food legislation (4, 12, 14, 15). Researchers have identified several microbial methods for vanillin production, each with advantages and limitations. To ensure the process is economically feasible, it is essential to identify cost-effective and readily available precursors. Among these, de novo biosynthesis from simple carbon sources, particularly glucose, has gained significant interest. With a price of less than $0.30 per kg, glucose is a highly economical and readily available substrate, making it a favourable choice for vanillin biosynthesis. Furthermore, glucose is preferred as a substrate to ferulic acid, eugenol and other phenolic compounds as it is non-toxic to microorganisms (1618). Lignin is another substrate of interest, as it is one of the most abundant polymers on earth and is produced in large quantities (millions of tonnes) as waste in the pulp and paper industry (19, 20). For use as a food additive, the recombinant vanillin host organism must be generally recognised as safe (GRAS) by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and/or have qualified presumption of safety (QPS) status according to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (21).

BIOTECHNOLOGICAL PRODUCTION OF VANILLIN

Bacterial vanillin synthesis

As a model organism, Escherichia coli has been genetically engineered to produce a vast number of compounds (2224), including vanillin (9). In 2005, Yoon et al. (25) introduced a feruloyl-CoA synthetase (fcs) and enoyl-CoA hydratase/aldolase (ech) from Amycolatopsis sp. into E. coli via a plasmid (Fig. 1 and Table 1 (25-39)). Using ferulic acid as a carbon source, the engineered strain produced 1.1 g/L vanillin (25). Enhancing the expression of the citrate synthase gene (gltA) of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle resulted in 1.98 g/L vanillin from 3 g/L ferulic acid (26). To further increase the yield, the consumption of acetyl-CoA was optimised by activating the glyoxylate bypass through the deletion of icdA gene. Amplification of the gltA gene and deletion of the icdA gene, together with the use of a polystyrenic resin XAD-2 to reduce vanillin toxicity, yielded 5.14 g/L vanillin with a molar conversion rate of 86.6 % (26).

Natural’ vanillin production routes from the precursors ferulic acid, (iso)eugenol and glucose. IEM=isoeugenol monooxygenase, EhyAB=eugenol hydroxylase, CalA=coniferyl alcohol dehydrogenase, CalB=coniferyl aldehyde dehydrogenase, FCS=feruloyl-CoA synthetase, ECH=enoyl-CoA hydratase/aldolase, 3DSD=3-dehydroshikimate dehydratase, COMT=catechol-O-methyltransferase, CAR=carboxylic acid reductase, PROGO=4-propylguaiacol oxidase, NOV1=isoeugenol dioxygenase


Recombinant bacterial hosts and their vanillin yields

Strain Modification Substrate Y(vanillin)/(g/L) Reference
E. coli DH5α Integration of FCS and ECH Ferulic acid           1.1 (25)
E. coli DH5α Integration of FCS and ECH, amplification of gltA Ferulic acid           1.98 (26)
E. coli DH5α Integration of FCS and ECH, amplification of gltA, ΔicdA Ferulic acid           5.14 (26)
E. coli K12 MG1655 Integration of CAR and COMT, deletion of AKRs and ADHs Glucose           0.481 (27)
E. coli BL21(DE3) Integration of IEM (from P. putida IE27) Isoeugenol           28.3 (28)
E. coli BL21(DE3) Integration of IEM (from P. nitroreducens Jin1) Isoeugenol           38.34 (29)
E. coli NEB 10β and E. coli BL21 AI Integration of PROGO and NOV1 4-n-propylguaiacol (from raw spruce)           66 % [sic!] (30)
E. coli MG1655 RARE Integration of TPADO, DCDDH, CAR, COMT Terephthalic acid           0.119 (31)
P. putida KT2440 Integration of FCS and ECH, Δvdh Ferulic acid           1.31 (32)
Amycolatopsis sp. ATCC 39116 Integration of FCS and ECH Ferulic acid           22.3 (33)
P. fluorescens BF13 Integration of FCS and ECH, Δvdh Ferulic acid           1.28 (34)
P. acidilactici BD16 Integration of FCS and ECH Ferulic acid           0.48 (35)
P. acidilactici BD16 Integration of FCS and ECH Ferulic acid (from agro-biomass waste)           4.01 (36)
Streptomyces sp. V-1 Strain isolated from soil, use of resin DM11 Ferulic acid           19.2 (37)
C. glutamicum Integration of CAR and COMT, ΔpcaHG, ΔvanAB, and ΔNCgl0324 Glucose           0.31 (38)
P. resinovorans SPR1 Screening for eugenol degrading bacteria Eugenol           0.24 (39)

FCS=feruloyl-CoA synthetase, ECH=enoyl-CoA hydratase/aldolase, CAR=carboxylic acid reductase, COMT=catechol-O-methyltransferase, IEM=isoeugenol monooxygenase, AKR=aldo-keto reductase, ADH=alcohol dehydrogenase, PROGO=4-propylguaiacol oxidase, NOV1=isoeugenol dioxygenase, TPADO=terephthalate 1,2-dioxygenase, DCDDH=2-dihydroxy-3,5-cyclohexadiene-1,4-dicarboxylate dehydrogenase, vdh=vanillin dehydrogenase, pcaHG=protocatechuate dioxygenase, vanAB=vanillate demethylase subunits A and B, NCgl0324=aromatic aldehyde reductase from the bacterium Corynebacterium glutamicum

Due to its low price and availability, glucose is considered a more cost-effective carbon source than ferulic acid (40). In 1998, Li and Frost (41) developed a microbial biosynthetic pathway for vanillin production from glucose. In this pathway, E. coli was engineered to catalyse the dehydration of 3-dehydroshikimic acid and the regioselective methylation of the resulting protocatechuic acid to produce vanillic acid. Vanillic acid was then reduced to vanillin by aryl-aldehyde dehydrogenase, purified from Neurospora crassa lysate. While effective, the in vitro reduction step depended on expensive cofactors (adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH)), making the process economically unfeasible for large-scale production. In 2024, Wu et al. (27) optimised the protocatechuic acid pathway in E. coli K12 MG1655 by screening for highly active carboxylic acid reductases and catechol O-methyltransferases. Using this vanillin production route can lead to the formation of vanillyl alcohol as a major side product. Therefore, the authors deleted three endogenous aldo–keto reductases and three alcohol dehydrogenases, while also regulating competitive metabolic pathways. Vanillin was produced from glucose at a yield of 481.2 mg/L (27).

Using isoeugenol monooxygenase (IEM), vanillin can be produced in one step from isoeugenol, a compound found in several essential oils, e.g. derived from clove, nutmeg or cinnamon (42). A recombinant plasmid carrying the IEM gene from Pseudomonas putida IE27 under the control of the T7 promoter was introduced into E. coli BL21(DE3), yielding 28.3 g/L vanillin from 230 mM isoeugenol. This represents a molar conversion yield of 81 % after 6 h of reaction and no accumulation of side products such as vanillic acid or acetaldehyde was reported (28). In 2021, the IEM from Pseudomonas nitroreducens Jin1 was cloned into E. coli, resulting in a recombinant strain that produced 38.34 g/L vanillin with >99 % purity (29). Marić et al. (30) presented a strategy to convert the lignin-derived monomer 4-n-propylguaiacol (4PG) into vanillin using engineered E. coli strains expressing 4-propylguaiacol oxidase (PROGO) and isoeugenol dioxygenase (NOV1). To overcome substrate inhibition, i.e. 4PG competitively inhibiting the second-step enzyme, and to accommodate different temperature optima (37 °C for PROGO and 25 °C for NOV1), a stepwise one-pot strategy was established. Using this method, a vanillin yield of 66 % from raw spruce-derived lignin oil was achieved on a small laboratory scale (250 µL reactions).

Concomitantly, to address plastic waste pollution, a novel approach to vanillin production has been explored. An E. coli MG1655 RARE strain was engineered to carry a novel synthetic pathway that can produce vanillin from polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Achieving a 79 % conversion of terephthalic acid to vanillin (119 mg/L), the study proposed a 157-fold improvement in vanillin yield through process optimisation, i.e. reaction temperature, medium optimisation and in situ product removal. This work documents the first biological upcycling of post-consumer PET into a single value-added small molecule. The findings suggest that PET waste may serve as a carbon source for producing high-value chemicals, contributing to a more circular economy and reducing plastic pollution (31).

Beyond E. coli, various other bacteria have also been used for vanillin production (Table 1). Pseudomonas putida KT2440 was optimised to convert ferulic acid to vanillin by enhanced chromosomal expression of the genes fcs and ech. To decrease further vanillin metabolism, Graf and Altenbuchner (32) deleted the vanillin dehydrogenase gene (vdh); however, this did not fully prevent vanillin turnover. High initial conversion rates and molar vanillin yields of up to 86 % were achieved within just 3 h, with little by-product formation. The highest vanillin titre reached in this approach was 1.31 g/L (32). Amycolatopsis sp. ATCC 39116 is attractive as a vanillin production host due to its high vanillin tolerance. After the introduction of fcs and ech through a plasmid, deletion of vdh and an optimisation of ferulic acid feeding strategies, a vanillin yield of 22.3 g/L was achieved. The deletion of vdh led to a more than 90 % decrease in vanillin turnover (33). A similar engineering strategy was used for converting ferulic acid to vanillin with Pseudomonas fluorescens, yielding 1.28 g/L (34).

Lactic acid bacterium Pediococcus acidilactici BD16 produced 0.48 g/L vanillin from 0.16 g/L [sic!] ferulic acid per milligram of recombinant cell biomass within 20 min of biotransformation. Heterologous genes fcs and ech were introduced via plasmids, and the process was statistically optimised and scaled up (35). The same recombinant P. acidilactici strain was used to explore vanillin production from ferulic acid in rice bran, targeting a more economical vanillin production. The strain yielded 4.01 g/L vanillin within 24 h of incubation with rice bran medium (36).

To address the problem of vanillin toxicity and product inhibition, the ability of resins to adsorb vanillin in situ was tested during the bioconversion of ferulic acid to vanillin using Streptomyces sp. strain V-1, which was isolated from soil samples and characterized. Using resin DM11, the highest amount of vanillin and the lowest amount of ferulic acid were adsorbed, resulting in a yield of 19.2 g/L vanillin within 55 h (37).

Several enzymes involved in reducing aromatic aldehydes to their corresponding alcohols were identified in Corynebacterium glutamicum. After the deletion of pcaHG, vanAB and NCgl0324 and the introduction of a carboxylic acid reductase and mutated catechol O-methyltransferase, the strain produced 0.31 g/L vanillin from glucose (38). Using eugenol as a carbon source, Ashengroph et al. (39) screened for eugenol-degrading bacteria and found Pseudomonas resinovorans. Without further optimisation, resting cells of P. resinovorans SPR1 produced 0.24 g/L vanillin, i.e. a molar yield of 10 %.

Fungal vanillin synthesis

In 1996, Lesage-Meessen et al. (43) described a two-step process using different filamentous fungi, Aspergillus niger and Pycnoporus cinnabarinus, to convert ferulic acid to vanillin (Table 2 (17, 18, 43, 44, 47-51)). First, A. niger transformed ferulic acid to vanillic acid, then P. cinnabarinus reduced vanillic acid to vanillin. Vanillic acid was produced at a molar yield of 88 %; however, the reduction to vanillin only yielded 22 %. Low vanillin yields resulted from P. cinnabarinus predominantly producing methoxyhydroquinone from vanillic acid. After the addition of phenolic precursors, the final vanillin yield was 237 mg/L (43). Following optimisation of medium components (i.e. carbon and nitrogen), environmental factors (such as pH), and a one-step biotransformation process under statistically optimal conditions, the molar yield of P. cinnabarinus increased to 54 %, producing 126 mg/L vanillin (43). Screening for isoeugenol-tolerant yeasts from soil samples led to the identification of Trichosporon asahii. This strain effectively converted isoeugenol to vanillin in a resting cell biotransformation without any genetic modifications. T. asahii produced 2.4 g/L vanillin from 5 g/L isoeugenol (44). Van den Heuvel et al. (45) demonstrated the potential of the flavoprotein vanillyl alcohol oxidase (VAO) from Penicillium simplicissimum for the ‘natural‘ synthesis of vanillin from creosol and capsaicin. The study identified two primary enzymatic pathways: (i) a two-step oxidative hydroxylation of creosol and (ii) the deamination of vanillyl amine (derived from capsaicin hydrolysis). While the capsaicin route was highly efficient, achieving nearly 100 % molar yields, the creosol route was limited by competitive inhibition and the formation of non-productive covalent flavin-substrate complexes at neutral pH.

(Recombinant) fungal and plant hosts and their vanillin yields

Strain Modification Substrate Y(vanillin) Reference
S. cerevisiae Integration of 3DSD, CAR, OMT Glucose 0.045 mg/L (17)
S. pombe Integration of 3DSD, CAR, OMT Glucose 0.065 mg/L (18)
P. cinnabarinus None Ferulic acid 0.126 mg/L (43)
A. niger I-1472 and P. cinnabarinus MUCL39532 None Ferulic acid 0.237 mg/L (43)
Trichosporon asahii None Isoeugenol 2.4 g/L (44)
S. cerevisiae BY4741 Integration of 3DSD, CAR, OMT (in total 24 genetic modifications) Glucose 0.366 mg/L (47)
Komagataella phaffii GS115 Δku70 Integration of TAL, HpaB, HpaC, OMT, FCS, ECH Glucose/caffeic acid 731.3 mg/L (48)
Capsicum frutescens Codon optimized VpVAN Ferulic acid 0.057 % (49)
Ocimum sanctum VpVAN overexpression Ferulic acid 1.98 mg/L (50)
Oryza sativa VpVAN integration Ferulic acid 544.72 μg/g (51)

3DSD=3-dehydroshikimate dehydratase, CAR=carboxylic acid reductase, OMT=O-methyltransferase, TAL=tyrosine ammonia lyase, HpaB= 4-hydroxyphenylacetate 3-monooxygenase, HpaC=NAD(P)H-flavin oxidoreductase, FCS=feruloyl-CoA synthetase, ECH=enoyl-CoA hydratase/aldolase, VpVAN=vanillin synthase

To address the problems in the creosol pathway, a later study (46) used directed evolution to optimise VAO for vanillin production from creosol. While the wild-type enzyme was hindered by the formation of a stable, non-productive covalent flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) N-5-creosol adduct, a single round of error-prone polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by high-throughput screening identified seven mutants with enhanced activity. Among them, a variant with four amino acid exchanges (I238T, F454Y, E502G and T505S) showed up to a 40-fold increase in catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) at pH 10. The improvement resulted from destabilization of an abortive adduct, which shifted the reaction towards product formation.

Hansen et al. (17) achieved the first successful microbial vanillin biosynthesis from glucose by integrating the complete vanillin biosynthesis pathway into a single microorganism. This was demonstrated in the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe, with vanillin production reaching 45 and 65 mg/L, respectively. Key enzymes included 3-dehydroshikimate dehydratase from Podospora pauciseta, an aromatic carboxylic acid reductase from Nocardia, and an O-methyltransferase from Homo sapiens. These findings suggested that the engineered yeasts represent a sustainable alternative to petrochemically derived vanillin (17). More recently, researchers used a MARE (minimal aromatic aldehyde reduction) yeast platform to improve vanillin yield from glucose by minimising vanillin reduction to vanillyl alcohol, optimising cofactor supply and reconfiguring the yeast's central metabolism. Overall, a total of 24 genetic modifications were introduced into S. cerevisiae, yielding a final vanillin titre of 365.55 mg/L (47). Building on these advances in metabolic engineering, Guo et al. (48) reported the first successful de novo synthesis of vanillin in the yeast Komagataella phaffii, reaching a titre of 731.3 mg/L using glucose as the sole carbon source. To prevent vanillin conversion to vanillic acid and vanillyl alcohol by endogenous enzymes, the researchers performed a systematic combinatorial knockout of 14 oxidoreductase genes. Notably, deletion of PAS14, PAS15 and PAS21 led to an 11.1-fold increase in vanillin production. Further improvements were achieved by rewiring metabolic pathways to increase the intracellular supply of l-tyrosine, NADPH and S-adenosylmethionine (SAM). To enhance the activity of the rate-limiting enzyme in the pathway, caffeic acid O-methyltransferase (NtCOMT), Guo et al. (48) combined molecular docking with saturation mutagenesis to generate the NtCOMTN312A/H315N variant. This variant exhibited a widened substrate channel and a 49.7 % increase in catalytic activity. Together, these strategies establish K. phaffii as a robust industrial chassis for the production of vanillin.

Plant vanillin synthesis

Vanillin is produced in the pods of V. planifolia (4). In the plant, the enzyme vanillin synthase (VpVAN) appears to convert ferulic acid to vanillin, which is glycosylated to protect the plant from the toxicity of the compound (5). In Capsicum frutescens (hot chilli pepper), ferulic acid and vanillin were found to be the intermediates in its phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathway (49). Using biolistics, C. frutescens cells were transformed with a codon-optimised VpVAN (Table 2). For the biotransformation, immobilized cell cultures were used and the vanillin content of transformed calli was 0.057 % compared to 0.0003 % of untransformed calli (49). To influence the phenylpropanoid pathway and phenolic compound accumulation in Ocimum sanctum, the VpVAN gene was overexpressed via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. LC–MS/MS analysis showed increased vanillin production in transgenic lines compared to O. sanctum wild type, with the highest vanillin content being (1.98±0.01) mg/g extract (50). A similar approach was used with rice calli derived from embryonic rice cells, engineered to carry a codon-optimised VpVAN gene. The vanillin yield in the fresh callus of rice cell culture was 544.72 μg/g (51). Compared to bacterial and fungal systems, plant vanillin synthesis shows lower yields and is also affected by growth environment and processing costs. At present, this makes recombinant plant hosts unsuitable to meet the vanillin market demand (2).

Microalgae are another versatile host for vanillin production, due to their rapid growth, high biomass productivity and metabolic versatility. They can produce several important molecules such as fatty acids, feedstocks for food, fuel and phenolic compounds (52, 53). Rico et al. (54) showed that Phaeodactylum tricornutum growing in natural seawater under iron and copper stress could produce several precursors of vanillin biosynthesis pathways. P. tricornutum was able to produce protocatechuic, vanillic, caffeic, coumaric and ferulic acids (54). Cell cultures of Haematococcus pluvialis were studied for their biotransformation of ferulic acid, p-coumaric acid and coniferyl aldehyde. When immobilised, H. pluvialis produced 10.6 mg/L vanillin, 5.4 mg/L vanillic acid, 3.3 mg/L vanillyl alcohol, 1.6 mg/L protocatechuic acid, 1.1 mg/L p-coumaric acid and 1.4 mg/L p-hydroxybenzoic acid from these substrates (55). Following these results, Tazon et al. (40) hypothesised the presence of putative enzymes that could be used for vanillin biosynthesis. Based on the sequences of already characterised enzymes such as VpVAN of V. planifolia, FCS and ECH of Streptomyces sp. V-1 and IEM of Pseudomonas nitroreducens Jin1, potential microalgal homologues were identified using BlastP in National center for biotechnology information (NCBI) (56). In four species of microalgae (Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, P. tricornutum, H. pluvialis and Chlorella vulgaris), homologues to the already characterised enzymes were identified. While microalgae are not yet ready for large-scale vanillin production, they represent an interesting alternative to the already existing hosts and may see increased use in the future.

VANILLIN TOXICITY IN BIOTECHNOLOGICAL PRODUCTION

A major bottleneck in the biotechnological production of vanillin is product toxicity. Vanillin is known to have a toxic effect on many organisms, inhibiting growth at concentrations below 0.5 g/L in S. cerevisiae or ≥0.76 g/L in E. coli (17, 57). As a rescue mechanism, the microorganisms rapidly oxidise or reduce vanillin to vanillic acid or vanillyl alcohol, respectively (58).

Mechanisms of vanillin toxicity in microorganisms

In general, vanillin is considered a membrane-active compound capable of forming pores in membranes and thus, destroying the membrane integrity in E. coli (59, 60). However, the underlying molecular mechanism of vanillin toxicity and its targets in the membrane remain unclear. A recent study suggested that adding exogenous vanillin disturbed key metabolic pathways in E. coli, leading to the accumulation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and activation of stress response pathways (58). In S. cerevisiae, vanillin: (i) induced oxidative stress responses, possibly causing mitochondrial fragmentation (61), and (ii) repressed translation (62). However, the effects of endogenously produced vanillin may be different from those of externally added vanillin.

Biotechnological strategies to mitigate vanillin toxicity

Modification via glycosylation

A more promising approach is the glycosylation of vanillin. By introducing a uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glycosyltransferase, vanillin was converted into vanillin-β-d-glucoside, which was non-toxic to yeast even at 25 g/L. In this study, a UDP-glycosyltransferase (UGT72E2) was expressed in S. pombe that was able to glycosylate 80 % of the produced vanillin (17). By further in silico design of S. cerevisiae, mutants with deletions of PDC1 and GDH1 produced up to 2-fold more vanillin glucoside than the unmutated strain in batch mode (63).

In situ product removal

Another strategy to mitigate vanillin toxicity is in situ product removal (ISPR), in which vanillin is continuously extracted from the fermentation broth using adsorbent resins or polymers. The product is then recovered, typically using organic solvents or distillation. For example, Ma and Daugulis (64) achieved a vanillin volumetric productivity of 0.45 g/(L·h) with Amycolatopsis sp. ATCC 39116 using Hytrel G4078W beads and ferulic acid as substrate, compared to 0.27 g/(L·h) in a single aqueous phase. However, the resin or polymer adsorbs vanillin, leading to losses during its recovery and requiring organic solvents. As an alternative, the same strain (Amycolatopsis sp. ATCC 39116) was cultivated in bioreactors using a multiple-pulse-feeding strategy with ferulic acid, where the broth was removed before each pulse and the biomass reused. This achieved a similar vanillin volumetric productivity of 0.46 g/(L·h) without a separate extraction phase (65). These studies highlight promising approaches for achieving high vanillin titres in non-engineered bacteria.

Metabolic engineering for tolerance and reduced degradation

Microbial strains can be engineered to increase their vanillin tolerance through chemical mutagenesis and adaptive evolution. An S. cerevisiae strain, EMV-8, grew in 2 g/L vanillin with a specific growth rate of μ=0.104/h, while its parent strain could not grow under the same conditions (66). Comparative genomic analysis between the vanillin-tolerant strain EMV-8 and its parent strain revealed more than 450 single nucleotide polymorphisms and 44 genes with insertions/deletions. Among the identified mutations, deleting the transcription factor YRR1 improved the maximum specific growth rate by 142 % in the presence of 0.91 g/L vanillin (67). Similarly, an nitrosoguanidine-mutagenesis-generated mutant of E. coli DH5α grew well in the presence of 2.0 g/L vanillin, while its wild-type strain showed only limited growth (68).

Microorganisms possess natural detoxification mechanisms involving the reduction of vanillin to vanillyl alcohol or its oxidation to vanillic acid. However, these are undesired side reactions in vanillin production as they lower the final vanillin yield. To decrease vanillin degradation, genes associated with these pathways are knocked out to increase vanillin titres. In S. cerevisiae, the alcohol dehydrogenase ADH6 (YMR318C) has been identified as one of the crucial genes for vanillin reduction (17, 69). Deletion of ADH6 decreased the conversion rate of vanillin to vanillyl alcohol by 50 % (17). Besides ADH6, several other gene products are associated with vanillin reduction activity, such as YNL134C or YJR096W (70). Recently, Mo and Yuan (47) developed a MARE platform strain for S. cerevisiae with 24 modifications by deleting a set of alcohol dehydrogenases, aldo-keto reductases and aldehyde reductases. This strain produced a vanillin titre of 365 mg/L from glucose with no detectable amount of vanillyl alcohol, highlighting the importance of eliminating competing degradation pathways.

CONCLUSIONS

‘Natural’ vanillin can be produced from the precursors ferulic acid, (iso)eugenol and glucose employing diverse natural and engineered host strains. The volumetric vanillin yields from biotransformations based on aromatic precursors are apparently higher than those from fermentations with glucose as the substrate. Both approaches, biotransformation of aromatic precursors and de novo bioproduction of vanillin from glucose or related carbon sources, have their advantages and disadvantages. Thus, at present, there is no clear preference for one or the other route in sourcing ‘natural’ vanillin. Biotransformations require costly precursors but deliver higher volumetric yields. Glucose as a feedstock is cheaper than aromatic precursors, but the fermentation yields are limited by vanillin toxicity and the capacities of vanillin sequestration strategies. Developing sophisticated vanillin withdrawal strategies might shift the balance in favour of the fermentative approach in future work, particularly as scaling a glucose-based process should be commercially more straightforward than scaling biotransformations of aromatic precursors.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank the FTB team for the invitation to contribute to this edition dedicated to Prof. Vladimir Mrša. H. Pichler fondly recalls several heartfelt invitations by Vlado to ‘Power of Microbes in Industry and Environment’ conferences in Croatia over the last 14 years. These extremely well-organized meetings have been very inspirational and provided ample opportunities to discuss overlapping interests with Vlado, particularly the yeast cell wall, protein secretion and display on the cell surface.

The COMET center: acib: Next Generation Bioproduction is funded by BMK, BMDW, SFG, Standortagentur Tirol, Government of Lower Austria and Vienna Business Agency in the framework of COMET: Competence Centers for Excellent Technologies. The COMET-Funding Program is managed by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency FFG.

FUNDING

The authors acknowledge support by the project VanillaFlow from the European Innovation Council (EIC) under grant agreement No. 101115293. The funding agencies did not influence the conduct of this research.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION

H. Pichler had the idea for this review, suggested the layout and content, and wrote the Summary and Conclusion chapters. S. Schmid and B. Berchtold conducted the literature survey, wrote the core part of the manuscript, and produced all figures and tables. All authors have read the final manuscript and approve its content.

REFERENCES
  1. Anand A, Khurana R, Wahal N, Mahajan S, Mehta M, Satija S. Vanillin: A comprehensive review of pharmacological activities. Plant Arch. 2019;19:1000-4
  2. Jiang W, Chen X, Feng Y, Sun J, Jiang Y, Zhang W. Current status, challenges, and prospects for the biological production of vanillin. Fermentation. 2023;9(4):389, https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9040389
  3. Cabeza Sánchez Á, Trygve Berglihn O, Ottaviano E, Rücker T, Pettersen T, Wittgens B. Innovative vanillin yielding from lignin: Process modelling and assessment. Open Res Eur. 2024;4:5, https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16734.2, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/39931569
  4. Gallage N, Møller B. Vanillin–bioconversion and bioengineering of the most popular plant flavor and its de novo biosynthesis in the vanilla orchid. Mol Plant. 2015;8(1):40-57, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2014.11.008, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/25578271
  5. Vanilla, raw. FAOSTAT database. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); 2022. Available from: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#search/vanilla
  6. Rao Y, Wang J, Zhao R, Zhan Y, Ma X, He P. Efficient sustainable production of protocatechuic acid from glucose by engineered Bacillus licheniformis. Chem Eng J. 2025;505, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.159320
  7. Olatunde A, Mohammed A, Ibrahim M, Tajuddeen N, Shuaibu M. Vanillin: A food additive with multiple biological activities. Eur J Med Chem Rep. 2022;5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmcr.2022.100055
  8. Liaqat F, Xu L, Khazi M, Ali S, Rahman M, Zhu D. Extraction, purification, and applications of vanillin: A review of recent advances and challenges. Ind Crops Prod. 2023;204(Part B), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117372
  9. Converti A, Aliakbarian B, Domínguez J, Vázquez G, Perego P. Microbial production of biovanillin. Braz J Microbiol. 2010;41:519-30, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822010000300001, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/24031526
  10. Hocking M. Vanillin: Synthetic flavoring from spent sulfite liquor. J Chem Educ. 1997;74(9):1055, https://doi.org/10.1021/ed074p1055
  11. Fache M, Boutevin B, Caillol S. Vanillin production from lignin and its use as a renewable chemical. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2016;4(1):35-46, https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01344
  12. Harshvardhan K, Suri M, Goswami A, Goswami T. Biological approach for the production of vanillin from lignocellulosic biomass (Bambusa tulda). J Clean Prod. 2017;149:485-90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.125
  13. Banerjee G, Chattopadhyay P. Vanillin biotechnology: The perspectives and future. J Sci Food Agric. 2019;99(2):499-506, https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9303, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/30094833
  14. Dong P, Fan Y, Huo Y, Sun L, Guo S. Pathway-adapted biosensor for high-throughput screening of o-methyltransferase and its application in vanillin synthesis. ACS Synth Biol. 2024;13(9):2873-86, https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.4c00287, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/39208264
  15. Krings U, Berger R. Biotechnological production of flavours and fragrances. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1998;49(1):1-8, https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051129, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/9487704
  16. Qiu D, Wang M, Zhou C, Zhao J, Zhang G. De novo biosynthesis of vanillin in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chem Eng Sci. 2022;263, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2022.118049
  17. Hansen E, Møller B, Kock G, Bünner C, Kristensen C, Jensen O. De novo biosynthesis of vanillin in fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) and baker’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75(9):2765-74, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02681-08, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/19286778
  18. Ni J, Tao F, Du H, Xu P. Mimicking a natural pathway for de novo biosynthesis: Natural vanillin production from accessible carbon sources. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):13670, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13670, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/26329726
  19. Calvo-Flores F, Dobado J. Lignin as renewable raw material. ChemSusChem. 2010;3(11):1227-35, https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201000157, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/20839280
  20. Schlemmer W, Nothdurft P, Petzold A, Riess G, Frühwirt P, Schmallegger M. 2-methoxyhydroquinone from vanillin for aqueous redox-flow batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59(51):22943-6, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202008253, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/32815619
  21. . Introduction of a Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) approach for assessment of selected microorganisms referred to EFSA - Opinion of the Scientific Committee. EFSA J. 2007;5(12):587, https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2007.587
  22. Chae T, Ko Y, Hwang K, Lee S. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the production of four-, five- and six-carbon lactams. Metab Eng. 2017;41:82-91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2017.04.001, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/28390749
  23. Yang D, Park S, Park Y, Eun H, Lee S. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for natural product biosynthesis. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38(7):745-65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.11.007, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/31924345
  24. Lin Z, Xu Z, Li Y, Wang Z, Chen T, Zhao X. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the production of riboflavin. Microb Cell Fact. 2014;13(1):104, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-014-0104-5, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/25027702
  25. Yoon S, Li C, Kim J, Lee S, Yoon J, Choi M. Production of vanillin by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Lett. 2005;27(22):1829-32, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-005-3561-4, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/16314978
  26. Lee E, Yoon S, Das A, Lee S, Li C, Kim J. Directing vanillin production from ferulic acid by increased acetyl-CoA consumption in recombinant Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;102(1):200-8, https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22040, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/18683263
  27. Wu R, Li D, Chen Q, Luo Z, Zhou J, Mao J. Optimization of vanillin biosynthesis in Escherichia coli K12 MG1655 through metabolic engineering. Bioresour Technol. 2024;411, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131189, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/39127360
  28. Yamada M, Okada Y, Yoshida T, Nagasawa T. Vanillin production using Escherichia coli cells over-expressing isoeugenol monooxygenase of Pseudomonas putida. Biotechnol Lett. 2008;30(4):665-70, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-007-9602-4, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/18040605
  29. Wang Q, Wu X, Lu X, He Y, Ma B, Xu Y. Efficient biosynthesis of vanillin from isoeugenol by recombinant isoeugenol monooxygenase from Pseudomonas nitroreducens Jin1. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2021;193(4):1116-28, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-020-03478-5, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/33411131
  30. Marić I, Guo Y, Fürst M, Van Aelst K, Van den Bosch S, De Simone M. A one-pot, whole-cell biocatalysis approach for vanillin production using lignin oil. Adv Synth Catal. 2023;365(22):3987-95, https://doi.org/10.1002/adsc.202300868
  31. Sadler J, Wallace S. Microbial synthesis of vanillin from waste poly(ethylene terephthalate). Green Chem. 2021;23(13):4665-72, https://doi.org/10.1039/D1GC00931A, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/34276250
  32. Graf N, Altenbuchner J. Genetic engineering of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 for rapid and high-yield production of vanillin from ferulic acid. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(1):137-49, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5303-1, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/24136472
  33. Fleige C, Meyer F, Steinbüchel A. Metabolic engineering of the actinomycete Amycolatopsis sp. strain ATCC 39116 towards enhanced production of natural vanillin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82(11):3410-9, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00802-16, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/27037121
  34. Di Gioia D, Luziatelli F, Negroni A, Ficca A, Fava F, Ruzzi M. Metabolic engineering of Pseudomonas fluorescens for the production of vanillin from ferulic acid. J Biotechnol. 2011;156(4):309-16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.08.014, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/21875627
  35. Kaur B, Chakraborty D, Kumar B. Metabolic engineering of Pediococcus acidilactici BD16 for production of vanillin through ferulic acid catabolic pathway and process optimization using response surface methodology. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(20):8539-51, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5950-x, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/25077778
  36. Chakraborty D, Selvam A, Kaur B, Wong J, Karthikeyan O. Application of recombinant Pediococcus acidilactici BD16 (fcs+/ech+) for bioconversion of agrowaste to vanillin. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;101(14):5615-26, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8283-8, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/28432440
  37. Hua D, Ma C, Song L, Lin S, Zhang Z, Deng Z. Enhanced vanillin production from ferulic acid using adsorbent resin. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;74(4):783-90, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0735-5, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/17124580
  38. Kim H, Choi J, Kim B, Ferrer L, Choi J, Wendisch V. Engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum as the platform for the production of aromatic aldehydes. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.880277, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/35646884
  39. Ashengroph M, Nahvi I, Zarkesh-Esfahani H, Momenbeik F. Pseudomonas resinovorans SPR1, a newly isolated strain with potential of transforming eugenol to vanillin and vanillic acid. N Biotechnol. 2011;28(6):656-64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2011.06.009, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/21689800
  40. Tazon A, Awwad F, Meddeb-Mouelhi F, Desgagné-Penix I. Biotechnological advances in vanillin production: From natural vanilla to metabolic engineering platforms. BioChem. 2024;4(4):323-49, https://doi.org/10.3390/biochem4040017
  41. Li K, Frost J. Synthesis of vanillin from glucose. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120(40):10545-6, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja9817747
  42. Zhao L, Xie Y, Chen L, Xu X, Zhao C, Cheng F. Efficient biotransformation of isoeugenol to vanillin in recombinant strains of Escherichia coli by using engineered isoeugenol monooxygenase and sol-gel chitosan membrane. Process Biochem. 2018;71:76-81, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2018.05.013
  43. Lesage-Meessen L, Delattre M, Haon M, Thibault J, Ceccaldi B, Brunerie P. A two-step bioconversion process for vanillin production from ferulic acid combining Aspergillus niger and Pycnoporus cinnabarinus. J Biotechnol. 1996;50(2-3):107-13, https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1656(96)01552-0, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/8987621
  44. Ashengroph M, Amini J. Bioconversion of isoeugenol to vanillin and vanillic acid using the resting cells of Trichosporon asahii. 3 Biotech. 2017;7(6):358, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0998-9, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/28979831
  45. van den Heuvel R, Fraaije M, Laane C, van Berkel W. Enzymatic synthesis of vanillin. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49(6):2954-8, https://doi.org/10.1021/jf010093j, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/11409992
  46. van den Heuvel R, van den Berg W, Rovida S, van Berkel W. Laboratory-evolved vanillyl-alcohol oxidase produces natural vanillin. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(32):33492-500, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M312968200, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/15169773
  47. Mo Q, Yuan J. Minimal aromatic aldehyde reduction (MARE) yeast platform for engineering vanillin production. Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2024;17(1):4, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-023-02454-5, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/38184607
  48. Guo Y, Zhou L, Lai W, Qian Z, Yu H, Cai M. Metabolic and enzyme rewiring enables high-production of vanillin in unconventional yeast. Metab Eng. 2026;93:158-67, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2025.10.002, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/41072653
  49. Chee M, Lycett G, Khoo T, Chin C. Bioengineering of the plant culture of Capsicum frutescens with vanillin synthase gene for the production of vanillin. Mol Biotechnol. 2017;59(1):1-8, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-016-9986-2, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/27826796
  50. Husain Z, Khan S, Sarfraz A, Iqbal Z, Chandran A, Khatoon K. Metabolic-engineering approach to enhance vanillin and phenolic compounds in Ocimum Sanctum (CIM-Angana) via VpVAN overexpression. Physiol Plant. 2024;176(6), https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.70005, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/39691076
  51. Arya S, Mahto B, Sengar M, Rookes J, Cahill D, Lenka S. Metabolic engineering of rice cells with vanillin synthase gene (VpVAN) to produce vanillin. Mol Biotechnol. 2022;64(8):861-72, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-022-00470-8, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/35192168
  52. Rizwan M, Mujtaba G, Memon S, Lee K, Rashid N. Exploring the potential of microalgae for new biotechnology applications and beyond: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018;92:394-404, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.034
  53. Cichoński J, Chrzanowski G. Microalgae as a source of valuable phenolic compounds and carotenoids. Molecules. 2022;27(24):8852, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248852, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/36557985
  54. Rico M, López A, Santana-Casiano J, Gonzàlez A, Gonzàlez-Dàvila M. Variability of the phenolic profile in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum growing under copper and iron stress. Limnol Oceanogr. 2013;58(1):144-52, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2013.58.1.0144
  55. Tripathi U, Ramachandra Rao S, Ravishankar G. Biotransformation of phenylpropanoid compounds to vanilla flavor metabolites in cultures of Haematococcus pluvialis. Process Biochem. 2002;38(3):419-26, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00135-8
  56. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K. BLAST+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:421, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-421, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/20003500
  57. Sana B, Chia K, Raghavan S, Ramalingam B, Nagarajan N, Seayad J. Development of a genetically programed vanillin-sensing bacterium for high-throughput screening of lignin-degrading enzyme libraries. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10(1):32, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0720-5, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/28174601
  58. Luziatelli F, Brunetti L, Ficca A, Ruzzi M. Maximizing the efficiency of vanillin production by biocatalyst enhancement and process optimization. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7:279, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00279, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/31681753
  59. Chen P, Liu Y, Li C, Hua S, Sun C, Huang L. Antibacterial mechanism of vanillin against Escherichia coli O157: H7. Heliyon. 2023;9(9), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19280, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/37662745
  60. Fitzgerald D, Stratford M, Gasson M, Ueckert J, Bos A, Narbad A. Mode of antimicrobial action of vanillin against Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus plantarum and Listeria innocua. J Appl Microbiol. 2004;97(1):104-13, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02275.x, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/15186447
  61. Nguyen T, Iwaki A, Ohya Y, Izawa S. Vanillin causes the activation of Yap1 and mitochondrial fragmentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng. 2014;117(1):33-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.06.008, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/23850265
  62. Iwaki A, Ohnuki S, Suga Y, Izawa S, Ohya Y. Vanillin inhibits translation and induces messenger ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) granule formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Application and validation of high-content, image-based profiling. PLoS One. 2013;8(4), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061748, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/23637899
  63. Brochado A, Matos C, Møller B, Hansen J, Mortensen U, Patil K. Improved vanillin production in baker’s yeast through in silico design. Microb Cell Fact. 2010;9(1):84, https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-9-84, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/21059201
  64. Ma X, Daugulis A. Transformation of ferulic acid to vanillin using a fed-batch solid–liquid two-phase partitioning bioreactor. Biotechnol Prog. 2014;30(1):207-14, https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.1830, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/24167066
  65. Valério R, Bernardino A, Torres C, Brazinha C, Tavares M, Crespo J. Feeding strategies to optimize vanillin production by Amycolatopsis sp. ATCC 39116. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2021;44(4):737-47, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-020-02482-7, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/33389106
  66. Shen Y, Li H, Wang X, Zhang X, Hou J, Wang L. High vanillin tolerance of an evolved Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain owing to its enhanced vanillin reduction and antioxidative capacity. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;41(11):1637-45, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-014-1515-3, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/25261986
  67. Wang X, Liang Z, Hou J, Shen Y, Bao X. The absence of the transcription factor Yrr1p, Identified from comparative genome profiling, increased vanillin tolerance due to enhancements of ABC transporters expressing, rRNA processing and ribosome biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:367, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00367, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/28360888
  68. Yoon S, Lee E, Das A, Lee S, Li C, Ryu H. Enhanced vanillin production from recombinant E. coli using NTG mutagenesis and adsorbent resin. Biotechnol Prog. 2007;23(5):1143-8, https://doi.org/10.1021/bp070153r, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/17711294
  69. Larroy C, Fernández M, González E, Parés X, Biosca J. Characterization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae YMR318C (ADH6) gene product as a broad specificity NADPH-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase: Relevance in aldehyde reduction. Biochem J. 2002;361(1):163-72, https://doi.org/10.1042/bj3610163, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/11742541
  70. Wang X, Liang Z, Hou J, Bao X, Shen Y. Identification and functional evaluation of the reductases and dehydrogenases from Saccharomyces cerevisiae involved in vanillin resistance. BMC Biotechnol. 2016;16(1):31, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-016-0264-y, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/27036139