getpdf NLM PubMed Logo  https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.60.04.22.7521  

Selection of Non-Mycotoxigenic Inulinase Producers in the Group of Black Aspergilli for Use in Food Processing

Sanja Stojanović1orcid tiny, Jelena Stepanović2orcid tiny, Bojana Špirović Trifunović3orcid tiny, Nataša Duduk3orcid tiny, Biljana Dojnov1*orcid tiny, Bojan Duduk2orcid tiny and Zoran Vujčić4orcid tiny

1University of Belgrade, Institute of Chemistry, Technology and Metallurgy, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Department of Chemistry, Njegoševa 12, 1100 Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

2Institute of Pesticides and Environmental Protection, Banatska 31/b, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia

3University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture, Nemanjina 6, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia

4University of Belgrade, Faculty of Chemistry, Department of Biochemistry, Studentski trg 12-16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

Article history:

Received: 7 October 2021

Accepted: 10 June 2022

cc by

Keywords:

ochratoxin; fumonisin; Aspergillus spp.; fructooligosaccharides; inulinase

Summary:

Research backgroundInulinases are used for fructooligosaccharide production and they are of interest for both scientific community and industry. Black aspergilli represent a diverse group of species that has use for enzyme production, in particular some species are known as potent inulinase producers. Finding new potential producers from the environment is as important as improving the production with known strains. Safe use of enzymes produced by aspergilli in food industry is placed ahead of their benefit for inulinase production.

Experimental approachHere we show a specific approach to finding/screening of newly isolated fungal inulinase producers that combines a newly developed screening method and an equally important assessment of the toxigenic potential of the fungus. In this study 39 black aspergilli collected from different substrates in Serbia were identified and assessed for inulinase production.

Results and conclusions. The most common species were Aspergillus tubingensis (51.2 %), followed by A. niger (23.1 %), A. welwitschiae (23.1 %) and A. uvarum (2.6 %). The isolates for inulinase production were selected using a cheap and easy, fast and non-hazardous alternative inulinase screening test developed in this work. Enzymatic activity of selected inulinase-producing strains was confirmed spectrophotometrically. Since some A. niger and A. welwitschiae strains are able to produce mycotoxins ochratoxin A (OTA) and fumonisins (FB), the toxigenic potential of selected inulinase producers was assessed analytically and genetically. Fungal enzyme producer can be considered safe for use in food industry only after comparing the results of both approaches for investigating toxic potential, the direct presence of mycotoxins in the enzyme preparation (analytically) and the presence of mycotoxin gene clusters (genetically). In some strains the absence of OTA and FB production capability was molecularly confirmed by the absence of complete or critical parts of biosynthetic gene clusters, respectively. The two best inulinase producers and mycotoxin non-producers (without mycotoxin production capability as additional safety) were selected as potential candidates for further development of enzyme production.

Novelty and scientific contributionThe presented innovative approach for the selection of potential fungal enzyme producer shows that only non-toxigenic fungi could be considered as useful in food industry. Although this study was done on local isolates, the approach is applicable globally.

*Corresponding author: +38111328239
  +381112184330
  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

INTRODUCTION

Aspergillus section Nigri (the black aspergilli) consists of a number of species rich in variety and number of enzymes and secondary metabolites, frequently used in biotechnological processes and food technology. On the other hand, many species can cause food spoilage on a wide variety of food substrates (soil, nuts, fruits, vegetables, meat and dairy products), and even human diseases (usually of immunocompromised patients). Moreover, they are typical, commonly present indoor fungi (1, 2). The most commonly occurring and also the most important industrial species is Aspergillus niger. It has a long history of use for enzyme production (3). Some black aspergilli are known as potent inulinase producers (4, 5). Inulinases are used for production of valuable prebiotics – fructooligosaccharides (FOS). A prebiotic is defined as a ’nondigestible compound that, through its metabolization by microorganisms in the gut, modulates the composition and/or activity of the gut microbiota, thus conferring a beneficial physiologic effect on the host’ (6). Applications of FOS are widespread: food and beverages (dairy products, baked goods, fermented meat, dry foods), as dietary supplements (food, nutrition, infant formulation) and in animal feed. FOS are used especially in combination with artificial high-intensity sweeteners, improving their sweetness and aftertaste. In human studies the tested daily doses of FOS vary in the range of 5–20 g, which represents 1–4% of the total food intake (estimations based on World Health Organization recommended daily food intake) (7). Prevalence of prebiotics in human diet is insufficient worldwide and therefore there is a need to increase their production and application in food products. The increase in the functional food market, specifically with regards to foods that contain prebiotics, has been tremendous over the last two decades. Globally, the prebiotic market is expected to continue to grow in the next years (8). This implies the need for research of new and improved inulinases. The pursuit of novel enzymes has prompted researchers to explore native fungal isolates from different habitats, which is often an important starting point (9, 10).

The screening of potential producers among fungi starts with the isolation of fungi from different habitats, cultivation on substrates for inducible enzymes and detection of enzymatic activity in the obtained fermentation extracts, and therefore studies usually analyze a small number of fungal isolates (9, 10). Another approach is based on direct selection during fungal growth on substrates for inducible enzymes (in situ) where results are evaluated in terms of colony growth by visual analysis of the formed mycelium (11) or by dyeing of nonhydrolyzed inulin after fungal growth (12). Both approaches for inulinase producer selection imply a long fungal growth period. It would be helpful to find suitable methods for selection among a high number of species. Fungi are to be grown for as short period as possible to avoid sporulation, which occurs in Aspergillus sometimes within just 48 hours. Enzyme activity is to be detected in a high number of extracts after fermentation as simply as possible and with great accuracy.

Black aspergilli share morphological features which makes their classification and identification difficult and therefore the taxonomy of the section Nigri has been revised several times (13). Currently, identification of Aspergillus species is based on a polyphasic approach which includes molecular, morphological and extrolite analyses (13, 14). Morphologically similar or sometimes undistinguishable species, grouped into Aspergillus niger ’aggregate’, can only be reliably identified based on molecular features, i.e. by analysis of the calmodulin (CaM) gene (14).

Apart from the favourable, direct economic effect of black aspergilli, some of them are mycotoxin-producing species. Mycotoxins are low-molecular-mass secondary metabolites produced by filamentous fungi which are acutely or chronically toxic and pose a health hazard to humans and vertebrates when acquired in small amounts orally, by inhalation, or via the skin (15). They are important for food safety and also for biotechnological processes since they represent a safety concern in the industrial application of fungi for enzyme or bulk metabolite production. Only non-toxicogenic strains can be used as source organisms in the production of enzyme preparations for use in food (16). For a long time, A. niger has been considered non-toxic in industrial conditions and is therefore Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) (17). While that remains true for some of the industrial strains, for others toxigenicity has been revealed and wild-type A. niger is considered by German authorities (BAUA, i.e. German Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) as a class 2 biological agent because of its potential to produce mycotoxins and cause disease in humans and animals (15, 18). The main mycotoxins produced by Aspergillus niger and its closely related species A. welwitschiae are ochratoxin A (OTA) and fumonisins (FB) (15, 18, 19). OTA and FB are classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as a possible human carcinogen (group 2B) (20). For a long time, Fusarium species had been known as producers of fumonisins (21), while for A. niger sequencing of the full genome in 2006 and discovery of a putative fum gene cluster indicated its potential to produce fumonisins (22, 23). Later, production of fumonisins by some industrial strains of A. niger and by some isolates from coffee beans has been reported (2426), as well as by some A. welwitschiae strains (27). Not all isolates of these species produce mycotoxins, and their frequency in population can vary. The toxigenic potential is genetically encoded by the fumonisin and ochratoxin biosynthetic gene clusters (28, 29).

There are limited data on the diversity of black aspergilli in Serbia, while no information on their OTA and FB toxigenicity and the associated risk are known. This information is particularly important having in mind that in recent studies in Serbia the most prevalent mycotoxins in plant-based animal feed were OTA and fumonisins, present in 91.4 and 68.6% of tested samples, respectively (30). It is not enough to determine whether a fungal enzyme producer produces hazardous mycotoxins under specified growth conditions; it is also important to examine whether there is a genetic potential for their production. Therefore, enzyme producers can be either selected based on the absence of genes involved in biosynthesis of mycotoxins or developed by deletion of the genes through mutagenesis (15, 18).

Screening for potential fungal inulinase producers and their safe utilization, particularly for food preparation (FOS), should only consider enzyme producers that are nontoxigenic. Therefore, the aims of this study are to: (i) identify black aspergilli isolated from different substrates in Serbia, (ii) develop a fast and unambiguous screening test to assess their inulinase production, and (iii) evaluate their mycotoxin-producing potential genetically and using analytical techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolation and identification of fungal strains

All reagents and solvents used in this study were of the highest available purity and were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany) Qiagen (Hilden, Germany) and Biolife (Milano, Italy). Black mould was isolated from different substrates (Table 1) from 2000 to 2016 using standard microbiological techniques by transferring conidia on potato dextrose agar (PDA) in Petri dishes and incubating at 28 °C for 7 days. Following incubation, the plates were examined, and fungal spores were transferred onto new PDA. Pure cultures were preserved in glycerol stocks and stored in laboratory strain bank UB483 at −70 °C.

Aspergillus section Nigri isolates used in this study and their inulinase activities

Isolate Geographic
origin
Source Year of isolation Identification Inulinase screening test Inulinase activity/(U/mL)*
FAT 1 Belgrade malt agar 2000 A. tubingensis - n.t.
FAT 2 Belgrade orange 2000 A. tubingensis - n.t.
FAT 25 Grabovac bread 2001 A. tubingensis - n.t.
FAT 26 Belgrade bread 2001 A. tubingensis - n.t.
FAT 27 Belgrade bread 2001 A. tubingensis + 0.098±0.002
FAT 28 Grabovac bread 2001 A. tubingensis - n.t.
FAT 29 Herceg Novi, Montenegro bread 2001 A. tubingensis + 0.101±0.003
FAT 30 Belgrade bread 2001 A. tubingensis + 0.067±0.006
FAT 31 Belgrade bread 2001 A. tubingensis + 0.123±0.003
FAT 32 Belgrade bread 2001 A. tubingensis + 0.119±0.002
FAT 33 Belgrade bread 2001 A. tubingensis - n.t.
FAT 34 Belgrade bread 2001 A. tubingensis + 0.075±0.003
FAT 35 Belgrade bread 2002 A. tubingensis + 0.104±0.002
FAT 36 Grabovac marmalade 2002 A. tubingensis - n.t.
FAT 37 Petrovac, Montenegro bread 2002 A. tubingensis - n.t.
FAT 38 Belgrade bread 2008 A. tubingensis + 0.096±0.004
FAT 39 Belgrade cellulose 2016 A. tubingensis + 0.122±0.002
FAT 40 Belgrade chestnut 2016 A. tubingensis - n.t.
FAT 41 Belgrade rice 2016 A. tubingensis + 0.193±0.005
FAT 42 Belgrade cereals mix 2009 A. tubingensis - n.t.
FAN 1 Belgrade lemon 2011 A. niger + 0.079±0.007
FAN 2 Belgrade bread 2002 A. niger - n.t.
FAN 3 Belgrade bread 2002 A. niger + 0.064±0.011
FAN 4 Prague, Czech Republic bread 2011 A. niger - n.t.
FAN 5 Belgrade Starch and soya extract mixture 2010 A. niger + 0.118±0.007
FAN 6 Belgrade Sambucus racemosa extract 2012 A. niger - n.t.
FAN 8 Belgrade corn flour 2016 A. niger + 0.180±0.009
FAN 9 Belgrade corn flour 2016 A. niger + 0.140±0.007
FAN 10 Belgrade rice 2016 A. niger + 0.163±0.005
FAW 1 Zemun bread 2001 A. welwitschiae + 0.472±0.004
FAW 2 Belgrade bread 2001 A. welwitschiae + 0.127±0.005
FAW 3 New Belgrade clindamycin capsule 2001 A. welwitschiae + 0.144±0.007
FAW 4 Belgrade lemon 2001 A. welwitschiae + 0.135±0.006
FAW 5 Krajišnik plum marmalade 2002 A. welwitschiae - n.t.
FAW 6 Belgrade wheat straw 2009 A. welwitschiae + 0.468±0.002
FAW 7 Belgrade artichoke silage 2012 A. welwitschiae - n.t.
FAW 8 Belgrade gelatin 2016 A. welwitschiae - n.t.
FAW 9 Belgrade tomato juice 2002 A. welwitschiae + 0.366±0.004
FAU 1 Belgrade soil 2012 A. uvarum - n.t.

*Each data point represents the mean of two independent assays±SEM (standard error of the mean). n.t.=not tested

DNA was extracted from the isolates grown on PDA for 2 days at 28 °C. Genomic DNA was extracted from white mycelium using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol of Day and Shatttock (31). Total DNA was precipitated with isopropanol, resuspended in TE buffer and stored at -20 °C until use. For identification, DNA was amplified with the primer pair CMD5/CMD6, based on CaM gene (32). PCR reaction mix (25 μL) contained 1 µL of template DNA, 1×PCR MasterMix (Thermo Fisher, Vilnius, Lithuania) and 0.4 μmol/L of each primer. The amplification parameters were as described previously (32). Samples without DNA were used as negative control. PCR products were observed on a 1% agarose gel, stained in ethidium bromide and visualized with UV transilluminator. Amplified CMD5/CMD6 product of each isolate was directly sequenced in both directions using the same primers as for the amplification. The obtained sequences were assembled using Pregap4 from the Staden program package (33), and compared with sequences publicly available using the MegaBlast algorithm (34). They were aligned with those of the strains representing the closest species using ClustalX (35), under MEGA X (36). Evolutionary history was inferred based on the partial CaM gene sequences of black aspergilli obtained in this study, reference strains and Aspergillus flavus as outgroup, using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method (MEGA X). A sequence evolution model was first chosen using the “find best model” option in MEGA X. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood approach, and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. To estimate the statistical significance of the inferred clades, 1000 bootstraps were performed (Fig. 1).

The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method and Kimura 2-parameter model (36) of 39 sequences of black aspergilli obtained in this work, reference strains, and Aspergillus flavus as the outgroup. The tree with the highest log likelihood is shown. Strain names and accession numbers are given in parentheses. The reference strains are in bold. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site


Screening of fungal inulinase producers

Fungal isolates were grown in solid medium (modified Czapek solution without sucrose, Jerusalem artichoke extract 167 g/L and agar-agar 15 g/L) for 33 h at 28 °C. Jerusalem artichoke was purchased from the local market (Belgrade, Serbia). Jerusalem artichoke exudate was prepared by homogenization of artichoke tubers in a blender to obtain all the liquid (rich in inulin) and the dry residues were discarded. Fermentation extracts for enzyme analysis were obtained by extraction with 25 mmol/L acetic buffer, pH=5.0, and shaking for 2 h at 150 rpm, with subsequent centrifugation and microfiltration.

Inulinase diffusion was screened in a 6% polyacrylamide (PAA) gel containing an incorporated substrate (20 g/L inulin). Samples of 20 μL (fermentation extracts) were added to the wells in the gel with an interval of 5 s and the reaction was carried out in a humid environment at 37 °C for 18 h. The gel was stained by nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) reagent in 0.3 mol/L NaOH. The resulting violet colouring around the wells indicates the existence of inulin hydrolysis products – reducing sugars (Fig. 2).

Screening test for potential inulinase producers among Aspergillus isolates on polyacrylamide gel with incorporated inulin. Hydrolyzing products were detected by NBT reagent. Isolates were identified in the following order: from A1 to B3 as A. niger (FAN1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10), from B4 to C6 as A. welwitschiae (FAW1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9), D1 as A. uvarum (FAU1), from D2 to G3 as A. tubingensis (FAT1, 2, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 and 42), and from G4 to G6 are denatured enzymes used as negative control


Inulinase activity was assayed according to the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) procedure (37). Inulin (5 g/L) was used as substrate, and the reaction was performed at pH=4.5 and 37 °C for 2 h. Absorbance of reaction products was measured spectrophotometrically at 540 nm (UV-1800 UV/Vis spectrophotometer; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). All enzyme assays were done in duplicate and represented as mean value±SEM (standard error of the mean). One unit of enzyme activity, U/mL, was defined as the amount of enzyme required to produce 1 μmol of the reaction product in 1 min under the conditions given above.

Mycotoxin gene cluster analyses

Fumonisin cluster genes fum1, fum7, fum10, fum15 and fum21 (2 regions designated I and II) were amplified using primer pairs and the amplification parameters as described by Susca et al. (28). Ochratoxin cluster genes ota1, ota2, ota3 and ota5 were amplified using primer pairs and the amplification parameters as described by Susca et al. (29). A confirmed ochratoxin producer (data not shown), an A. welwitschiae isolate from the collection of the Postharvest laboratory (University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture), was used as positive control in the PCRs for amplification of ota genes. PCR reaction mix, negative controls and PCR product observation were as described for amplification of CaM. The presence of amplicons of appropriate size was considered as positive reaction. Amplification products of fum1 of all analyzed strains were sequenced in both directions with the primers applied for amplification (Macrogen Inc., Seoul, Korea). The obtained fum1 sequences were assembled, manually inspected, compared as described for CaM, and were deposited in the NCBI GenBank (38) under accession numbers given in Fig. 3. The sequences were aligned with those publicly available from the previously described strains using Clustal X, under MEGA X (29, 35, 36). Evolutionary history was inferred based on the fum1 sequences of strains (A. niger and A. welwitschiae) from this study and 20 previously published and toxigenically characterized A. welwitschiae and A. niger strains, using the ML method, as described for CaM.

The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method and Kimura 2-parameter model (36) of 17 fum1 sequences of black aspergilli obtained in this work. The tree with the highest log likelihood is shown. Strain names and accession numbers are given in parentheses. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site


Mycotoxin analyses

Determination of mycotoxin and inulinase production

All A. welwitschiae isolates were grown for 96 h on coarse ground triticale grains, at 28 °C and relative humidity (RH) 60% in solid-state fermentation (SSF) in a Thermostat chamber (HPP IPP plus; Memmert USA, LLC; Eagle, WI, USA). Triticale (×Triticosecale sp.) “Odisej” line was obtained from the Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Novi Sad, Serbia. After 96 h, the substrates were covered with white mycelium and there was no sporulation. Fermentation extracts for mycotoxin analysis were obtained by extraction with 100 mL of 25 mmol/L acetic buffer, pH=4.5, and shaking for 2 h at 150 rpm, with subsequent centrifugation at 13 257xg (Thermo Scientific SL40R; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and microfiltration (glass microfiber filters GF/B, 1.0 μm; Whatman, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Buckinghamshire, UK). Protein concentrations in fermentation extracts were determined according to Bradford (39). Inulinase activity was assayed as described above (section Screening of fungal inulinase producers), at 50 °C for 15 min. Specific inulinase activity was defined as U per mg of proteins. Productivity of inulinase during fermentation was defined as U/(mL·h).

LC-MS/MS analysis of mycotoxins

All reagents were of HPLC grade and purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Merck KGaA. OTA, FB1 and FB2 were extracted by modified QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged and Safe) procedure (40). After centrifugation at 4816xg (Thermo Scientific SL40R; Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 5 min, 1 mL of acetonitrile supernatant was filtered through a 0.45-µm syringe filter prior to LC-MS/MS analysis of OTA. For FB1 and FB2 determination, 1 mL of supernatant was evaporated in a stream of nitrogen and then reconstituted in 1 mL of φ(acetonitrile,water)=50%. LC-MS/MS conditions were optimized using MassHunter Optimizer software (41), based on quantitation/qualification ion 239/221 for OTA, which resulted in fragmentation and collision energy of 105/120 and 20/33 V, respectively. Linearity of detector response was investigated based on solvent (acetonitrile) and matrix match calibrations with U-[13C20]-OTA as internal standard. Quantitation/qualification ion 353.3/334.4 for FB1 resulted in fragmentation and collision energy of 140/140 and 40/40 V, and ion 336.3/318 for FB2 in fragmentation and collision energy of 140/140 and 35/35 V, respectively. Linearity of detector response was investigated based on solvent (acetonitrile/water) and matrix match calibrations with U-[13C34]-FB1 as internal standard. For LC analysis, an Agilent 1260 Infinity (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) HPLC system with a binary pump was used, equipped with a reversed-phase C18 analytical column of 50 mm×4.6 mm and 1.8 µm particle size (Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18; Agilent Technologies). The mobile phase was Milli-Q water (solvent A) and methanol (solvent B), both containing 0.02 mol/L formic acid in gradient mode (5% at 0 min, 50% for 5 min, 98% for 20 min), with a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. The injection volume was 10 μL. For mass spectrometry analysis, an Agilent 6460 Triple-Quad LC/MS system was applied and Agilent MassHunter B.06.00 software (41) was used for data acquisition and processing. Analysis was performed in the positive ion mode for both OTA and fumonisins. The electrospray ionization (ESI) source values were as follows: drying gas (nitrogen) temperature 300 °C, drying gas flow rate 5 L/min, nebulizer pressure 310.3 kPa and capillary voltage 3500 V. Mycotoxins were detected using the dynamic multiple reaction monitoring mode (dMRM).

Statistical analysis

All inulinase activity tests in Screening of fungal inulinase producers were performed in duplicate and the results are presented as mean value±SEM (standard error of the mean). All inulinase activity tests in Mycotoxins and inulinase production section were performed in triplicate and the results are presented as mean value±S.D. (standard deviation). One-way ANOVA with post hoc multiple comparison tests (Tukey’s test; p<0.05) were used to define statistical differences among produced enzymes using GraphPad Prism v. 8.4.3. software (42).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Identification of fungal strains

A total of 39 pure culture isolates from different substrates (Table 1) showing morphological features of black aspergilli (fast growing with abundant dark brown to black sporulation) were subjected to molecular identification. Using the CAM5/CAM6 primer pair in the PCR, the expected length amplicons (~0.6 kb) were obtained with all studied isolates, while no amplification was obtained for negative control (data not shown). Direct sequencing of the obtained calmodulin amplicons yielded nucleotide sequences (528-560 nt long), which were deposited in the NCBI GenBank (38) under accession numbers given in Fig. 1. In the phylogenetic analyses of the obtained CaM amplicon sequences and the representative strains of the closest species, Serbian black aspergilli isolates clustered within the Aspergillus nigri clade and they formed four highly supported separate subclusters with representatives of four species, thereby confirming identification of 20 isolates as A. tubingensis, nine as A. welwitschiae, nine as A. niger, and one as A. uvarum (Fig. 1).

Black aspergilli represent a diverse group of species commonly present on different substrates ((1)). In this study, isolates of black aspergilli collected for several years and from different substrates in Serbia were identified as belonging to four Aspergillus species, based on the morphology and CaM phylogeny proposed by Samson et al. (14). The most common was A. tubingensis (more than half) followed by A. niger and equally frequent A. welwitschiae, and the least frequent was A. uvarum.

Inulinase producer screening

All fungal isolates were grown on modified Czapek’s agar, in which inulin extracted from artichoke tubers replaced sucrose, for 33 h without signs of sporulation. A quality diffusion test for inulinase activity was developed. The quantity of added enzyme, substrate concentration and reaction time were optimized. A total of 39 isolates from different substrates (shown in Table 1) were tested. Results of enzyme screening demonstrated that 22 isolates were positive in the diffusion test: ten A. tubingensis isolates, six A. niger isolates and six A. welwitschiae isolates (Fig. 2).

Enzymatic activity was quantified spectrophotometrically (UV-1800 UV/Vis spectrophotometer; Shimadzu) only of the isolates that were recognized as positive in the screening test on an inulin polyacrylamide gel. The obtained results of enzymatic activity are given in Table 1. A. welwitschiae strains FAW1, FAW6 and FAW9 have proven to be significant inulinase producers among Aspergillus section Nigri. A. tubingensis strains FAT30 and FAT34, and A. niger strains FAN1 and FAN3 had much lower inulinase activity.

The identified Serbian black aspergilli were tested for their potential to produce inulinases. For that purpose, we introduced a cheap and sensitive alternative inulinase producer screening test, which requires neither hazardous, growth restricting chemicals nor special equipment, and furthermore, yields conclusive results within 33 h. The described screening method represents an easy and fast way to detect potential fungal producers of inulinases. A large number of strains can be tested within a short period. The aim of developing this test was to decrease the time required to find and determine potential inulinase producers. Fermentation lasts only 33 h, which is enough time for fungi (Aspergillus spp.) to grow and to produce enzymes. A short fermentation production time is very important both to obtain a rapid response and to avoid sporulation, which is undesirable when dealing with a large number of fungal strains for several reasons: cross-contamination, safety of those performing the work, and possible false results resulting from changes in the enzyme production due to the advent of the next hyphae generation (43). Screening does not require protein purification; it uses the raw fermentation extract.

The idea for the second phase of the screening test originates from a pioneering enzymatic diffusion test in agarose gels (44). The diffusion test described here was done in PAA gel, which makes handling much easier and provides more precise and limited diffusion. Reaction products of inulin hydrolysis are reducing sugars which are retained in the PAA gel in places where inulin is hydrolyzed due to the precise and limited application of the enzyme to the wells. Detection of those small molecules would be difficult if the enzymes were applied to the surface of the agarose gel via filter paper as in other diffusion tests described (44, 45). The aim of the developed diffusion screening test was to detect the activity of all inulinase enzymes (endoinulinase and exoinulinase) that act synergistically on inulin. Staining of the substrate on which the fungi grow only detects endoinulinase (12), which was not the aim of this research. Both inulinase enzymes are industrially important for obtaining inulooligosaccharides and fructooligosaccharides and they are usually both present in the fungal genome. The most commonly used spectrophotometric test for inulinase activity measures the hydrolysis product in this reaction, by which the activities of fungal fermentation extracts selected after screening were determined. Screening in inulin PAA gel reduced the number of required spectrophotometric analyses.

Among all tested species, isolates that produce inulinases as well as those that did not show the production of these enzymes were found. Most of A. niger and A. welwitschiae, and half of A. tubingensis isolates were inulinase producers. Among them, some strains of A. welwitschiae can be, by far, marked off as producers of higher amounts of inulinases (i.e. FAW1, FAW6 and FAW9). Since these species are known to be able to produce mycotoxins (27), determining their mycotoxin-producing potential, to ensure safe further usage of these isolates as producers of enzymes that will be used for food, was necessary. Therefore, A. welwitschiae isolates were subjected to further mycotoxin production analyses.

Mycotoxin and inulinase production

The first step is certainly to determine whether mycotoxins are produced under conditions that are optimal for enzyme production. Solid-state fermentation (SSF) is a good choice for fungal enzyme production thanks to its advantages, such as low cost, high efficiency, reduced catabolic repression, easy maintenance, easy scale-up, etc. (46). Agro-industrial wastes and/or by-products are mainly composed of complex carbohydrates and crude proteins that can be useful as nutrients for microbial growth and as inducible substrates for enzyme production (47, 48). For that purpose, we used natural substrate (triticale grains) for SSF, which previously proved good for inulinase production (49), to grow A. welwitschiae isolates and determine the presence of mycotoxins. The maximum inulinase production was determined on the 4th day of the production by five A. welwitschiae strains isolated from different sources and geographic regions, with different enzymatic activities, specific enzymatic activities and productivity (Table 2). It is known that different fungal sources (substrate composition and environmental conditions) have led to the production of different enzyme sets that actually allow them to grow in different habitats (43, 50, 51). Therefore, differences in inulinase amounts are expected here as well, since fungi originate from different habitats. FAW1 and FAW6 stood out, where FAW1 was the best (also shown in screening test) inulinase producer. Significant differences in the production of inulinase among isolates were verified by ANOVA test (F4,10=352.4, p<0.0001****, Table 2).

Production of inulinase by Aspergillus welwitschiae isolates on triticale grains on the fourth day of SSF (maximum production)

Isolate γ(protein)/ (mg/mL) Inulinase activity/(U/mL) Specific inulinase activity/(U/mg) Productivity/ U/(mL·h) γ(mycotoxin)/ (μg/mL)
FAW 1 (0.22±0.01)a (10.4±0.8)a (46.0±3.5)a (0.11±0.01)a 0a
FAW 3 (0.33±0.01)b (1.09±0.04)b (3.4±0.1)b (0.01±0.00)b 1.87b
FAW 4 (0.26±0.02)bc (0.89±0.03)bc (3.4±0.1)bc (0.01±0.00)bc 2.62c
FAW 6 (0.33±0.02)d (6.4±0.3)d (18.9±1.0)d (0.063±0.006)d 0ad
FAW 9 (0.309±0.001)bce (1.45±0.09)bce (4.6±0.3)bce (0.013±0.006)bce 0.39e

Each data point represents the mean value of three independent assays±S.D. (standard deviation). Mean values followed by the same letter in superscript are not significantly different (Tukey’s; p<0.05)

FB2 production was confirmed in FAW2, FAW3, FAW4, FAW5 and FAW9 isolates using HPLC analysis of their fermentation fluids, while the production of FB1 was not detected in the assessed isolates (Table 3).

Production of fumonisins (FB1 and FB2) and ochratoxin A (OTA), and mycotoxin biosynthetic gene amplification of Aspergillus niger and A. welwitschiae isolates examined in this study

Species Isolate γ(mycotoxin)/(µg/mL) Fumonisin cluster genes Ochratoxin cluster genes
FB1 FB2 OTA fum1 fum7 fum10 fum15 fum21 I fum21 II Ota 1,2,3,5
A. niger FAN 1 n.t. n.t. n.t. + + + + + + -
A. niger FAN 2 n.t. n.t. n.t. + + + + + + -
A. niger FAN 3 n.t. n.t. n.t. + + + + + + -
A. niger FAN 4 n.t. n.t. n.t. + + + + + + -
A. niger FAN 5 n.t. n.t. n.t. + + + + + + -
A. niger FAN 6 n.t. n.t. n.t. + + + + + + -
A. niger FAN 8 n.t. n.t. n.t. + + + + + + -
A. niger FAN 9 n.t. n.t. n.t. + + + + + + -
A. niger FAN 10 n.t. n.t. n.t. + + + + + + -
A. welwitschiae FAW 1 0 0 0 + - - + - - -
A. welwitschiae FAW 2 0 2.85 0 + + + + - + -
A. welwitschiae FAW 3 0 1.87 0 + + + + - + -
A. welwitschiae FAW 4 0 2.62 0 + + + + - + -
A. welwitschiae FAW 5 0 2.38 0 + + + + - + -
A. welwitschiae FAW 6 0 0 0 + - - + - - -
A. welwitschiae FAW 7 0 0 0 + + + + - + -
A. welwitschiae FAW 9 0 0.39 0 + + + + - + -

n.t.=not tested

None of the tested A. niger and A. welwitschiae isolates contain any ochratoxin gene amplicons. HPLC analysis of fermentation fluids confirmed the results obtained by gene analysis and showed that the analyzed A. welwitschiae isolates do not produce ochratoxin under these growth conditions (Table 3).

All assessed A. niger and A. welwitschiae isolates were analyzed for the presence of six genes in fum cluster and four genes in ota cluster and the obtained results are presented in Table 3.

All A. niger isolates yielded amplicons for all six fum genes, while A. welwitschiae isolates yielded two amplicon patterns. The first fum amplification pattern of A. welwitschiae, present in two isolates (FAW1 and FAW6), consisted of fum1 and fum15 gene amplicons only, while the second, present in six isolates (FAW2, FAW3, FAW4, FAW5, FAW7 and FAW9) consisted of fum1, fum7, fum10, fum15 and fum21 II gene amplicons. The fum21 I gene was not amplified in any of the assessed A. welwitschiae isolates (Table 3). Direct sequencing of the obtained fum1 amplicons from A. niger and A. welwitschiae yielded nucleotide sequences 630-678 nt long, which were deposited in the NCBI GenBank under accession numbers given in Fig. 3 (38). For phylogenetic analyses based on partial fum1 sequences, 19 A. niger and 18 A. welwitschiae from this publication and other previously described and characterized strains were selected. The unrooted fum1 phylogenetic tree indicated clustering of A. welwitschiae strains into two highly supported separate clusters. One cluster encloses only fumonisin (FB)-non-producing strains, while the other cluster contained both, FB-producing and non-producing strains. However, no separate clusters of A. niger and A. welwitschiae were formed.

HPLC analysis of OTA showed that none of the assessed A. welwitschiae strains produced OTA, which was corroborated by the PCR analyses of ota gene cluster. Furthermore, our results confirmed a previously reported almost complete deletion of the ota cluster in OTA-non-producing A. welwitschiae (29). Although OTA-non-producers with incomplete deletion of ota cluster have been reported (52), complete deletion of ota cluster should imply the loss of ability to produce OTA under any conditions. The low percentage of OTA-producing strains among A. welwitschiae is not a surprise when compared to other studies where a minority of the strains have persistently shown to produce OTA. In most of the studies this percentage varies from 0 to 1% (5254), while Susca et al. (29) reported 25%. Additionally, PCR analysis of ota cluster in A. niger suggests complete deletion, hence no producers of OTA among them either.

Unlike OTA gene analyses, which are fully consistent with Susca et al. (29), the analysis of FB revealed a slightly different situation. In our work, A. welwitschiae strains with incomplete fum gene cluster observed in the PCR pattern (compared to A. niger and f-1 pattern of A. welwitschiae) proved to be able to produce FB, although the incompletion was reflected as the presence of only partial amplification of the fum 21 gene. In the work of Susca et al. (29), only A. welwitschiae strains with intact fum cluster (compared to A. niger) and f-1 fum gene amplification pattern were able to produce FB. The lack of amplification of fum21 I in FB-producing A. welwitschiae may not mean nonfunctional fum 21, since Sun et al. (55) showed that functional fum 21 is essential for FB synthesis in Fusarium proliferatum. In Susca et al. (29), fum gene amplification patterns observed in the PCR assays were reported not to be consistent with the genomic sequences.

HPLC analyses of FB showed that out of eight assessed A. welwitschiae strains, five produced FB2, while three were non-producers of FB (i.e. FAW1, FAW6 and FAW7). Fum gene cluster analyses showed the presence of two patterns among A. welwitschiae strains. The presence of complete fum cluster genes, which is characteristic of FB-producers, was confirmed in six isolates. In two isolates (i.e. FAW1 and FAW6) some gene regions did not amplify and this is in agreement with Susca et al. (29), who found that multiple patterns of fum gene deletion are characteristic of FB-non-producing A. welwitschiae. In one strain (FAW7) the lack of FB production in the presence of complete fum cluster genes was detected. Two reasons can be given for such an outcome: (i) fumonisin production can vary under different conditions, hence it cannot be excluded that the strain could produce FB under different conditions, and (ii) production of FB could be affected by regulatory genes located outside the fum cluster, as it is the case for Fusarium sp. (56). Also, we analyzed the obtained fum1 gene sequences, which is considered as the key gene in the FB biosynthetic pathway, that encode polyketide synthase (57). The results obtained in this work are consistent with the previously published results of phylogenetic analysis of full-length fum1 and fum15 nucleotide sequences separately and concatenated (28). The partial fum1 nucleotide sequence phylogeny inferred in this work showed separation of A. welwitschiae strains into two well supported clades, one of which consisted solely of FB-non-producing, while the other consisted of both FB-producing and -non-producing strains.

Strain FAW7 was initially selected as a good inulinase producer and it did not coproduce FB under selected conditions, but its mycotoxin potential represents a substantial risk for its use as a producer of enzymes for food. It is encouraging that among the selected inulinase producers, two (FAW1 and FAW6) are non-toxigenic (both OTA and FB) and they have a potential for further evaluation and possible use for inulinase production.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important to be certain that the producers of enzymes that are used in food industry do not produce mycotoxins during enzyme production, or even better, are not capable of producing mycotoxins at all. The latter can be achieved by using nontoxigenic species or strains that lack fully or partly the genetic repertoire for biosynthetic pathways of mycotoxin production. Only by combining all of the presented results (possibility of fungi to secrete mycotoxins and enzymatic activity) can it be concluded whether a strain is a potentially good enzyme producer. We selected two strains of Aspergillus welwitschiae (FAW1 and FAW6) for further development for enzyme production as the best inulinase producers and mycotoxin non-producers, with the absence of the whole ota cluster and essential components of the fum cluster as additional safety.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Jasna Bojčevski for linguistic correction as well as for useful suggestions on the writing of the article.

FUNDING

This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Republic of Serbia Contract numbers: 451-03-68/2022-14/200026, 451-03-68/2022-14/ 200214, 451-03-68/2022-14/200116 and 451-03-68/2022-14/200168.

AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTION

S. Stojanović was actively included in data collection, data analysis and interpretation, performing the analyses (screening method, enzymatic activities and genetical experiments) and in writing the paper. J. Stepanović was included in data analysis, interpretation and performing the analysis of genetical experiments (identification and mycotoxin potential). B. Špirović Trifunović performed part of the analyses for this work. N. Duduk was included in data analysis and interpretation for genetical experiments, drafting and writing the article, and final approval of the version to be published. B. Dojnov contributed to the conception of the work, data analysis and interpretation of enzymatic activities and screening method, drafting the article, and final approval of the version to be published. B. Duduk contributed to the conception of the work, data analysis and interpretation of genetical results (identification and mycotoxin potential), drafting the article, critical revision and final approval of the version to be published. Z. Vujčić contributed to the interpretation of the results, critical revision and final approval of the version to be published.

REFERENCES
  1. Pitt JI, Hocking AD, editors. Fungi and food spoilage. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2009. 10.1007/978-0-387-92207-210.1007/978-0-387-92207-2, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92207-210.1007/978-0-387-92207-2
  2. Houbraken J, de Vries R, Samson R. Modern taxonomy of biotechnologically important Aspergillus and Penicillium species. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2014;86:199-249, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800262-9.00004-4, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/24377856
  3. Fernandes P, Carvalho F. Microbial enzymes for the food industry. In: Demain A, Adrio J, editors. Biotechnology of microbial enzymes: Production, biocatalysis and industrial applications. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Inc.; 2017. pp. 513–44. 10.1016/B978-0-12-803725-6.00019-410.1016/B978-0-12-803725-6.00019-4, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803725-6.00019-410.1016/B978-0-12-803725-6.00019-4
  4. Ettalibi M, Baratti J. Purification, properties and comparison of invertase, exoinulinases and endoinulinases of Aspergillus ficuum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1987;26(1):13-20, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00282143
  5. Ohta K, Akimoto H, Matsuda S, Toshimitsu D, Nakamura T. Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of two endoinulinase genes from Aspergillus niger. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1998;62(9):1731-8, https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.62.1731, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/9805373
  6. Bindels L, Delzenne N, Cani P, Walter J. Opinion: Towards a more comprehensive concept for prebiotics. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;12(5):303-10, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2015.47, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/25824997
  7. Valcheva R, Dieleman L. Prebiotics: Definition and protective mechanisms. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;30(1):27-37, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2016.02.008, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/27048894
  8. Prebiotics Market Statistics Report 2026 | Growth Forecasts 2021. Selbyville, DE, USA: Global Marktet Insights. 2021;GMI410. Available from: https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/prebiotics-market
  9. Abu El-souod S, Mohamed T, Ali E, El-badry M, El-keiy M. Partial purification of extracellular exo-inulinase from Ulocladium atrum. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2014;12(1):15-20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2014.04.001
  10. Rawat H, Ganaie M, Kango N. Production of inulinase, fructosyltransferase and sucrase from fungi on low-value inulin-rich substrates and their use in generation of fructose and fructo-oligosaccharides Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2015;107(3):799-811, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-014-0373-3, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/25559021
  11. Gern R, Furlan S, Ninow J, Jonas R. Screening for microorganisms that produce only endo-inulinase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;55(5):632-5, https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530000578, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/11414332
  12. Silvera D, Luthfin I, Aulia A, Wahyu PN, Saryono. Optimization of process parameters for inulinase production from endophytic fungi Fusarium solani LBKURCC67, Humicola fuscoatra LBKURCC68 and Fusarium oxysporum LBKURCC69. Res J Chem Environ. 2018;22(Special issue II):71–8.
  13. Samson R, Varga J, Witiak S, Geiser D. The species concept in Aspergillus: Recommendations of an international panel. Stud Mycol. 2007;59:71-3, https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2007.59.09, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/18490943
  14. Samson R, Visagie C, Houbraken J, Hong S, Hubka V, Klaassen C. Phylogeny, identification and nomenclature of the genus Aspergillus. Stud Mycol. 2014;78(1):141-73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2014.07.004, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/25492982
  15. Frisvad J, Møller L, Larsen T, Kumar R, Arnau J. Safety of the fungal workhorses of industrial biotechnology: update on the mycotoxin and secondary metabolite potential of Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae, and Trichoderma reesei. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102(22):9481-515, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9354-1, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/30293194
  16. WHO food additives series 47: Safety evaluation of certain mycotoxins in food: Prepared by the fifty-sixth meeting of the joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). Geneva, Switzerland: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization (FAO/WHO); 2002;906:1–62.10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00160-5, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00160-5
  17. Sewalt V, Shanahan D, Gregg L, La Marta J, Carrillo R. The generally recognized as safe (GRAS) process for industrial microbial enzymes. Ind Biotechnol (New Rochelle NY). 2016;12(5):295-302, https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2016.0011
  18. Frisvad J, Larsen T, Thrane U, Meijer M, Varga J, Samson R. Fumonisin and ochratoxin production in industrial Aspergillus niger strains. PLoS One. 2011;6(8), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023496, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/21853139
  19. Perrone G, Mulè G, Susca A, Battilani P, Pietri A, Logrieco A. Ochratoxin A production and amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis of Aspergillus carbonarius, Aspergillus tubingensis, and Aspergillus niger strains isolated from grapes in Italy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(1):680-5, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.72.1.680-685.2006, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/16391107
  20. Agriopoulou S, Stamatelopoulou E, Varzakas T. Advances in occurrence, importance, and mycotoxin control strategies: Prevention and detoxification in foods. Foods. 2020;9(2):137, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9020137, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/32012820
  21. Bezuidenhout S, Gelderblom W, Gorst-Allman C, Horak R, Marasas W, Spiteller G. Structure elucidation of the fumonisins, mycotoxins from Fusarium moniliforme. J Chem Soc Chem Commun. 1988;(11)743-5, https://doi.org/10.1039/c39880000743
  22. Baker S. Aspergillus niger genomics: Past, present and into the future. Med Mycol. 2006;44:S17-21, https://doi.org/10.1080/13693780600921037, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/17050415
  23. Pel H, De Winde J, Archer D, Dyer P, Hofmann G, Schaap P. Genome sequencing and analysis of the versatile cell factory Aspergillus niger CBS 513.88. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(2):221-31, https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1282, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/17259976
  24. Noonim P, Mahakarnchanakul W, Nielsen K, Frisvad J, Samson R. Fumonisin B2 production by Aspergillus niger in Thai coffee beans. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2009;26(1):94-100, https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030802366090, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/19680876
  25. Månsson M, Klejnstrup M, Phipps R, Nielsen K, Frisvad J, Gotfredsen C. Isolation and NMR characterization of fumonisin B2 and a new fumonisin B6 from Aspergillus niger. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58(2):949-53, https://doi.org/10.1021/jf902834g, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/20028011
  26. Frisvad J, Smedsgaard J, Samson R, Larsen T, Thrane U. Fumonisin B2 production by Aspergillus niger. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55(23):9727-32, https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0718906, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/17929891
  27. Renaud J, Kelman M, Qi T, Seifert K, Sumarah M. Product ion filtering with rapid polarity switching for the detection of all fumonisins and AAL-toxins. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2015;29(22):2131-9, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7374, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/26467225
  28. Susca A, Proctor R, Butchko R, Haidukowski M, Stea G, Logrieco A. Variation in the fumonisin biosynthetic gene cluster in fumonisin-producing and nonproducing black aspergilli. Fungal Genet Biol. 2014;73:39-52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2014.09.009, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/25281783
  29. Susca A, Proctor R, Morelli M, Haidukowski M, Gallo A, Logrieco A. Variation in fumonisin and ochratoxin production associated with differences in biosynthetic gene content in Aspergillus niger and A. welwitschiae isolates from multiple crop and geographic origins. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1412, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01412, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/27667988
  30. Rokvić N, Aksentijević K, Kureljušić J, Vasiljević M, Todorović N, Zdravković N. Occurrence and transfer of mycotoxins from ingredients to fish feed and fish meat of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) in Serbia. World Mycotoxin J. 2020;13(4):545-52, https://doi.org/10.3920/WMJ2020.2580
  31. Day J, Shattock R. Aggressiveness and other factors relating to displacement of populations of Phytophthora infestans in England and Wales. Eur J Plant Pathol. 1997;103(4):379-91, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008630522139
  32. Hong S, Go S, Shin H, Frisvad J, Samson R. Polyphasic taxonomy of Aspergillus fumigatus and related species. Mycologia. 2005;97(6):1316-29, https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2006.11832738, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/16722222
  33. Staden R, Beal KF, Bonfield JK. The Staden package, 1998. In: Misener S, Krawetz SA, editors. Bioinformatics methods and protocols. Methods in molecular biology, vol. 132. Totowa, NJ, USA: Humana Press; 2000. pp. 115–30. 10.1385/1-59259-192-2:11510.1385/1-59259-192-2:115, https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-192-2:11510.1385/1-59259-192-2:115
  34. Mount DW. Using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST). Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2007(7):pdb.top17. 10.1101/pdb.top1710.1101/pdb.top17, https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.top1710.1101/pdb.top17
  35. Thompson J, Gibson T, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins D. The CLUSTAL X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25(24):4876-82, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.24.4876, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/9396791
  36. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(6):1547-9, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/29722887
  37. Bernfeld P. Amylases, α and β. Methods Enzymol. 1955;1(C):149-58, https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(55)01021-5
  38. GenBank. Bethesda, MD, USA: National Center for Biotechnology Information, US National Library of Medicine; 2016. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank
  39. Bradford M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248-54, https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/942051
  40. Official Method A. 01. Pesticide residues in foods by acetonitrile extraction and partitioning with magnesium sulfate. J AOAC Int. 2007;90(2):17-26
  41. Agilent MassHunter Optimizer for Ultivo LC/TQ Automated MS Method Development Software. Santa Clara, CA, USA: Agilent Technologies; 2017. Available from: https://lcms.labrulez.com/paper/7169
  42. GraphPad Prism, v. 8.4.3, San Diego, CA, USA; 2020. Available from: https://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/
  43. Grujić M, Dojnov B, Potočnik I, Atanasova L, Duduk B, Srebotnik E. Superior cellulolytic activity of Trichoderma guizhouense on raw wheat straw. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;35(12):194, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-019-2774-y, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/31776792
  44. Davis B. Enzyme determining sctivity by radial diffusion. Am Biol Teach. 1977;39(4):217-26, https://doi.org/10.2307/4445882
  45. Kulkarni J, Kothari M, Baig M. Optimization of disc diffusion assay to study pectinase. Int J Adv Biotechnol Res. 2013;4(3):324-8
  46. Singh SK, Sczakas G, Soccol CR, Pandey A. Production of enzymes by solid-state fermentation. In: Pandey A, Soccol RC, Larroche C, editors. Current developments in solid-state fermentation. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2008. pp. 183–204. 10.1007/978-0-387-75213-6_910.1007/978-0-387-75213-6_9, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75213-6_910.1007/978-0-387-75213-6_9
  47. Grujić M, Dojnov B, Potočnik I, Duduk B, Vujčić Z. Spent mushroom compost as substrate for the production of industrially important hydrolytic enzymes by fungi Trichoderma spp. and Aspergillus niger in solid state fermentation. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 2015;104:290-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.04.029
  48. Soccol C, da Costa E, Letti L, Karp S, Woiciechowski A, de Souza Vandenberghe L. Recent developments and innovations in solid state fermentation. Biotechnol Res Innov.. 2017;1(1):52-71, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biori.2017.01.002
  49. Dojnov B, Grujić M, Vujčić Z. Highly efficient production of Aspergillus niger amylase cocktail by solid-state fermentation using triticale grains as a well-balanced substrate. J Serb Chem Soc. 2015;80(11):1375-90, https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC150317041D
  50. Schneider W, Dos Reis L, Camassola M, Dillon A. Morphogenesis and production of enzymes by Penicillium echinulatum in response to different carbon sources. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/254863, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/24877074
  51. Benoit I, Culleton H, Zhou M, DiFalco M, Aguilar-Osorio G, Battaglia E. Closely related fungi employ diverse enzymatic strategies to degrade plant biomass. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8(1):107, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-015-0285-0, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/26236396
  52. Massi F, Sartori D, de Souza Ferranti L, Iamanaka B, Taniwaki M, Vieira M. Prospecting for the incidence of genes involved in ochratoxin and fumonisin biosynthesis in Brazilian strains of Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus welwitschiae. Int J Food Microbiol. 2016;221:19-28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.01.010, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/26803270
  53. Gherbawy Y, Elhariry H, Kocsubé S, Bahobial A, El Deeb B, Altalhi A. Molecular characterization of black Aspergillus species from onion and their potential for ochratoxin A and fumonisin B2 production. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2015;12(5):414-23, https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2014.1870, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/25713980
  54. Qi T, Renaud J, McDowell T, Seifert K, Yeung K, Sumarah M. Diversity of mycotoxin-producing black aspergilli in canadian vineyards. J Agric Food Chem. 2016;64(7):1583-9, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b05584, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/26837797
  55. Sun L, Chen X, Gao J, Zhao Y, Liu L, Hou Y. Effects of disruption of five FUM genes on fumonisin biosynthesis and pathogenicity in Fusarium proliferatum. Toxins (Basel). 2019;11(6):327, https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11060327, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/31181598
  56. Woloshuk C, Shim W. Aflatoxins, fumonisins, and trichothecenes: A convergence of knowledge. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013;37:94-109, https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6976.12009, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/23078349
  57. Gil-Serna J, Vázquez C, Patiño B. Genetic regulation of aflatoxin, ochratoxin A, trichothecene, and fumonisin biosynthesis: A review. Int Microbiol. 2020;23:89-96, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-019-00084-2, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/31144067